Skip to main content

Minimum requirements

Make sure you have correctly set up Authentication & Authorization.

Definition

Arguments

The “scopes” argument requires an array (GraphQL List) of nested arrays. The outer array represents a set of OR scopes—the token must satisfy at least one of the inner arrays. Each inner array represents a set of AND scopes—the token must possess all scopes within that array. In other words, scopes: [["a", "b"], ["c"]] means: ("a" AND "b") OR ("c"). Each element in the AND scopes array should be an openfed__Scope Scalar, which is an instance of permissions as defined in your authentication token. For example, "read:field".

Declaration

OR Scopes

Consider the following @requiresScopes declared on Query.a:
If an agent wished to select Query.a, it would require EITHER the "read:field" permission OR the "read:scalar" permission.

AND Scopes

Consider the following @requiresScopes declared on Query.b:
If an agent wished to select Query.b, it would require BOTH the "read:field" permission and the "read:scalar" permission. Lack of one or both would return an authorization error.

Multiple OR scopes with multiple AND scopes

Consider the following @requiresScopes declared on Query.c:
If an agent wished to select Query.c, it would require at least one of the following sets of scopes: (("read:field" AND "read:scalar") OR ("read:query" AND "read:private") OR ("read:all"))

Declaration

The @requiresScopes directive can be declared on Enums, field definitions, Interfaces, Objects, and Scalars.

Declaration on field definitions (Interface and Object fields)

When @requiresScopes is declared on an Object field definition, that specific field will be protected (require the specified scopes). For example, given the following federated schema:
The field Query.ids would be protected in the following operation:
The behavior is similar for Interfaces. For example, given the following federated schema:
The field Interface.id would be protected in the following operation (but note that @requiresScopes declared on an Interface field does not protect the fields of its implementations):

Declaration on the “type level” (Enums, Interfaces, Objects, and Scalars)

When @requiresScopes is declared on the “type level”, all field definitions with that named type (the innermost response type name) will require those scopes to access. For example, consider the following federated schema:
Above, @requiresScopes has been declared on:
  1. The Enum “Enum”
  2. The Interface “Interface”
  3. The Object “ObjectB”
  4. The Scalar “Scalar”
Consider now the following operation:
  1. Query.enums requires scopes because it returns type “Enum”, which requires the scopes "read:enum".
  2. Query.interfaces requires scopes because it returns type “Interface”, which requires the scopes "read:interface".
  3. Query.objectAs.enum requires scopes because it returns type “Enum”, which requires the scopes "read:enum".
  4. Query.objectAs.scalar requires scopes because it returns type “Scalar”, which requires the scopes "read:scalar".
  5. Query.objectBs requires scopes because it returns type “ObjectB”, which requires the scopes "read:object".
  6. Query.scalars requires scopes because it returns type “Scalar”, which requires the scopes "read:scalar".

Federation

The @requiresScopes directive will always persist in the federated schema.

Shared fields

If @requiresScopes is declared on a field definition in one subgraph, and another instance of the same field definition (a shared field) is defined in another subgraph without @requiresScopes, then @requiresScopes will still be declared on the federated field. This also means that selecting this field will always require the defined scopes, regardless of whether it would be resolved from a subgraph that did not declare @requiresScopes. This is shown in the example below:

Combining scopes in the same subgraph

When scopes are defined in multiple places (for example, on a field and on its return type), each set of scopes is combined with every set from the other definition.
The maximum total number of scopes that can apply to a single field both directly and indirectly is 16.
Algorithm
  1. Take each set of scopes from the first definition.
  2. Combine it with each set from the second definition.
  3. Merge the scopes in each pair into a single AND set.
The resulting scope sets are the Cartesian product of the two scope lists, with each pair merged into a single AND scope set.

Simple example

Field scopes: [["read:query"]] Type scopes: [["read:scalar"]] Result: [["read:query", "read:scalar"]] Selecting Query.scalars requires both "read:query" AND "read:scalar".

Multiple OR scopes

Field scopes: [["read:query"], ["read:private"]] Type scopes: [["read:scalar"]] Result:
An access token requires ("read:query" AND "read:scalar") OR ("read:private" AND "read:scalar").

Full example

Field scopes (3 sets) × Type scopes (2 sets) = 6 resulting sets: This is effectively the same as:

Combining scopes across subgraphs

When multiple instances of a shared field or type define scopes across different subgraphs, the same combination rule applies—each set of scopes from one subgraph is combined with every set from the other. Consider the following subgraphs:
The scopes from each subgraph are combined, and the result is shown in the federated graph:
Note that the federated graph shows the combined result of scopes for a specific field or type. The effective scopes, i.e., the “type level” scopes affecting a field, will not be reflected in the federated graph.

Combining scopes (superset reduction)

After scopes are combined, any scope set that is a superset of another set is removed. A superset is redundant because the smaller set already grants access with fewer permissions. Consider the following subgraphs:
Combining the scopes produces 6 sets: After reduction:
  • ["read:id", "read:field"] and ["read:field", "read:id"] are duplicates and supersets of both ["read:id"] and ["read:field"] - removed.
  • ["read:private", "read:id"] is a superset of ["read:id"] - removed.
  • ["read:private", "read:field"] is a superset of ["read:field"] - removed.
The resulting federated graph:

Errors

In the event that an agent without relevant permissions selects a non-nullable field that is declared with @requiresScopes, an authorization error will be returned, and the entire data will be null (see Non-nullable authenticated data requested among unauthenticated data).
In the event that an agent without relevant permissions selects a nullable field that is declared with @requiresScopes, an authorization error will be returned, and the specific field will be null (see Partial data):

Partial data (nullable data requiring permissions)

Imagine an agent without relevant permissions selects a field that is declared with @requiresScopes and the response type of that field is nullable. However, the agent also selects a field that is not declared @requiresScopes (nor are any potential nested fields). In this event, an authorization error will still be returned, but the specific data that requires authentication will be null, while the data not requiring authentication will be returned. Consider the following federated graph and corresponding query:
An agent without any permissions sending the query above would receive something like the following:

Non-nullable data requiring scopes requested among data not requiring scopes

In the event an agent without relevant permissions selects any non-nullable fields that declare @requiresScopes (and therefore require one or more permissions), an authorization error will be returned, and the entire data will return null. This is true even if one or more field selections did not require permissions or are nullable. Consider the following federated graph and corresponding query:
An agent without the "read:int" permission sending the query above would receive something like the following:

Partial permissions

An agent must have all relevant permissions within at least one entire set of AND scopes among the OR scopes declared through @requiresScopes for a selected field to return data. In the event that the agent has some but not all permissions, the error message will be transparent: